Оффлайн
- Регистрация
- 9 Май 2015
- Сообщения
- 1,483
- Баллы
- 155
Theories of Motivation
1. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
A five-level pyramid of human needs, from basics to peak performance:
- Physiological (food, water, rest)
- Safety (job security, health)
- Love/Belonging (teamwork, friendships)
- Esteem (recognition, status)
- Self-actualization (creativity, growth)
Analogy: Think of building a house—foundation (physiological/safety), walls (relationships/esteem), roof (self-actualization). You can’t decorate the roof until the foundation is solid.
Real-Life Example:
An entry-level employee worried about rent (physiological) won’t focus on taking on stretch assignments (self-actualization) until pay and benefits are secure.
2. McGregor’s Theory X & Y
Two contrasting views of workers:
• Theory X: People dislike work, need strict control and direction.
• Theory Y: People view work as natural, seek responsibility, can self-direct.
Analogy: Driving vs. GPS navigation—Theory X is a driver forced to follow every instruction; Theory Y is a driver with turn-by-turn guidance who can adjust speed and route.
Real-Life Example:
A manager who believes in Theory Y lets team members set their own deadlines; they often outperform when trusted.
3. Herzberg’s Motivation–Hygiene Theory
Work factors split into two sets:
• Hygiene Factors (salary, policies, environment) – prevent dissatisfaction but don’t motivate.
• Motivators (achievement, recognition, growth) – drive real satisfaction.
Analogy: A car needs tires (hygiene) to run safely, but the engine (motivators) makes it go fast.
Real-Life Example:
Improving office coffee and lighting (hygiene) stops complaints—but only awarding “Employee of the Month” (motivator) sparks excitement and pride.
4. Alderfer’s ERG Theory
Condenses Maslow into three core needs:
- Existence (physiological + safety)
- Relatedness (belonging + esteem from others)
- Growth (esteem + self-actualization)
Analogy: You’re a plant—water and soil (existence), network of roots connected to other plants (relatedness), sunlight for photosynthesis (growth).
Real-Life Example:
Remote teams may meet existence needs (pay), but must schedule virtual coffee breaks to satisfy relatedness before helping employees stretch into new roles (growth).
5. McClelland’s Theory of Needs
Focuses on three learned needs:
- Achievement: desire to excel
- Affiliation: desire for close relationships
- Power: desire to control and influence
Analogy: In a sports team—star striker (achievement), team captain (affiliation), head coach (power).
Real-Life Example:
A salesperson (high achievement) thrives on monthly targets, while an HR coordinator (high affiliation) finds fulfillment in team-building events.
6. Vroom’s Expectancy Theory
Motivation ($M$) = Expectancy ($E$) × Instrumentality ($I$) × Valence ($V$):
- Expectancy: belief effort leads to performance
- Instrumentality: belief performance leads to reward
- Valence: value placed on the reward
Analogy: You study ($E$), pass the exam ($I$), and earn a scholarship you care about ($V$)—all multiply to drive your effort.
Real-Life Example:
When a company ties a clear bonus ($V$) to hitting sales targets ($I$), and reps trust that selling more leads to that bonus ($E$), motivation soars.
Comparison Table of Motivation Theories
| Theory | Key Focus | Needs/Factors | Managerial Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maslow | Hierarchy of five needs | Physiological → Safety → Belonging → Esteem → Growth | Secure basics before pushing for innovation |
| McGregor | Assumptions about worker nature | Theory X (control) vs. Theory Y (self-direction) | Choose a style that matches your team’s maturity |
| Herzberg | Job satisfaction vs. hygiene | Hygiene (pay, policy) vs. Motivators (recognition) | Fix hygiene first, then add meaningful rewards |
| Alderfer (ERG) | Three core needs | Existence, Relatedness, Growth | Address relatedness via team rituals during change |
| McClelland | Learned motivational drivers | Achievement, Affiliation, Power | Match roles to dominant needs (sales vs. coaching) |
| Vroom | Expectancy of outcomes | Expectancy, Instrumentality, Valence | Clarify “if–then” links between effort and reward |
By understanding these theories, you can craft environments and incentives that truly drive performance and satisfaction in your team.