Bruno vs Postman: Which API Client Should You Choose?

[Sascha]

For years, Postman has been the go-to tool for testing and managing APIs. But lately, Bruno — a lightweight, Git-friendly, offline-first API client — has been winning the hearts of developers.

In this article, we’ll look at:

• What Bruno is and why it’s different
• Key features that make Bruno stand out
• A side-by-side comparison of Bruno vs Postman
• Where Bruno is better — and where Postman still shines

Quick Feature Comparison

Feature	Bruno 🟢	Postman 🟠
Data Storage	Local .bru files (Git-friendly, plain text)	Cloud-first (exports possible but less transparent)
Offline Support	Works fully offline	Limited, many features need cloud
Version Control	Git-native workflow	Export/import required
Performance	Lightweight, fast	Can feel heavy
Pricing	Open source (free core, paid pro tiers)	Freemium with limits; paid tiers for advanced features

Why Bruno is Gaining Traction

• Local-first design — your collections are files you can commit to Git.
• No login needed — works fully offline, with privacy in mind.
• CLI and IDE support — great for automation and CI/CD.
• Lightweight and fast — fewer distractions, quicker workflows.

Where Postman Still Wins

• Mock servers and API monitoring
• Team dashboards and collaboration
• Enterprise-level governance and integrations

Want the full deep-dive comparison with detailed features, pros/cons, and plugin links?

I’ve written a complete guide here:

Пожалуйста Авторизируйтесь или Зарегистрируйтесь для просмотра скрытого текста.

Pro tip: if you’re a solo dev, freelancer, or small team, Bruno may cover 90% of your API testing needs without the overhead of Postman. If you’re in an enterprise setting, Postman’s collaboration features may still be essential.

Источник:

Пожалуйста Авторизируйтесь или Зарегистрируйтесь для просмотра скрытого текста.